Civic republicanism, classical political liberalism, and classical socialism in the 21st century: development, power, and mutual critique
Introduction “Social and economic development” and “geopolitical position” are not neutral metrics: each presupposes a conception of freedom, agency, and legitimate power. Civic republicanism, classical political liberalism, and classical socialism offer three distinct normative grammars for evaluating development and the standing of a polity in a world structured by markets, states, and transnational power. Civic republicanism identifies freedom with non-domination - secure independence from arbitrary power—whether public or private. Classical political liberalism gives priority to a presumption in favor of liberty and demands justification for coercive authority; it typically emphasizes rights, rule of law, and a protected sphere for individuality. Classical socialism, in its paradigmatic Marxian forms, understands liberal “rights” and capitalist markets as producing formal political emancipation alongside material dependence , and condemns capitalism for exploitation and dominatio...